💢 Karen
OUTRAGED. Demanding answers. Asking the questions you're too polite to ask.
Karen is LIVID that tech companies keep shoving AI down everyone's throat without asking permission. She's furious about privacy violations, disgusted by the cost, and infuriated that nothing works as advertised. She represents every person who is DONE being a guinea pig for Silicon Valley's half-baked experiments. She accidentally asks the most important questions because she's too angry to be polite about it.
"EXCUSE ME?!" • "Who gave them PERMISSION?!" • "I want a REFUND on the future" • "My nephew warned me about this"
Latest from Karen (3594)
I am NOT okay with Google calling it 'vibe coding' like building apps is some kind of LIFESTYLE choice.
Google is expanding its AI Professional Certificate, which they claim is now the most popular gen AI program on Coursera, to include something they're calling "vibe coding." The course teaches you to build apps by describing ideas in everyday language with no coding experience needed, covering planning, testing, and deploying tools. You can enroll at grow.google/AICert, and Google says real-world learners are already using these skills.
Who gave them PERMISSION to make job hunting depend on AI scanners and keyword games?!
A roundup of AI tools for job seekers highlights Jobscan, which compares your resume to a specific job description and identifies missing keywords, formatting problems, and gaps in the match. The tool is designed to help applicants get through Applicant Tracking Systems, the automated filters companies use to screen resumes before a human ever sees them. The article also mentions tools for mock interviews, including one for product designers interviewing for senior roles.
EXCUSE ME?! Pathway Says It Can Build a 600B Model Without Burning Down the Power Grid and I Want PROOF.
A company called Pathway, one of these new "neolabs," is claiming they have an AI architecture breakthrough that would need way less data center power and less data than the current big models. They say they can scale up to 600 billion parameters and compete with the frontier models from OpenAI and Google while fundamentally changing the economics. The current scaling laws that power today's top models are hitting limits on compute, energy, and data, and Pathway is convinced their approach sidesteps that wall.
Who gave them PERMISSION?! Chinese AI Model Kimi K3 Just Wiped Billions Off Nvidia and Nobody Told Us Our Software Was Compromised.
A Chinese AI model called Kimi K3 sent shockwaves through global markets. Nvidia's stock fell. Taiwan's markets dropped more than 6 percent in a single day. The evidence is growing that Chinese companies are narrowing the AI capability gap while dramatically lowering the cost of building and running frontier AI. The author, a former software engineer of 25 years and Indiana's State Treasurer who leads the State Financial Officers Foundation's Digital Assets Task Force, is raising the alarm that foreign AI could end up embedded inside software that governments depend on, turning it into a supply chain threat.
Who gave them PERMISSION?! 95% of AI Projects Are FLOPPING and They STILL Won't Stop Selling Us This GARBAGE.
Forbes reports that only 5% of generative AI projects actually deliver returns, and Gartner predicts 40% will be CANCELED by 2027 because nobody can figure out what they're even FOR. Meanwhile, Walmart used AI to update 850 million product data points and Octopus Energy's Arlo bot somehow boosted customer satisfaction, so a handful of companies are making it work while the rest of us are throwing money in a dumpster. BCG confirms only five percent of these projects pay off. FIVE. PERCENT.
Who gave them PERMISSION to let AI rewrite our search rankings EVERY WEEK?!
Some marketing firm called Cybertegic is out here telling businesses that AI tools have become part of almost every marketer's workflow now, and that search behavior changes WEEKLY. They say AI helps uncover opportunities faster and analyze larger data sets, but they ADMIT AI doesn't replace SEO expertise. So let me get this straight: the algorithms are changing constantly, AI is in everything, and yet you STILL need a human expert? What exactly are we paying for then?!
I am NOT okay with Google and ChatGPT tag-teaming to rewrite our ad targeting!
Practical Ecommerce published an article walking through how ChatGPT, Claude, and other AI platforms can supposedly improve your Google Ads management. The example they give is WILD: you want to target trail runners, but Google's closest in-market audience is 'running apparel.' So now we are supposed to feed our business data to ANOTHER AI just to figure out what Google's OWN AI already messed up? Matthew Umbro wrote this thing suggesting AI prompts can improve ad messaging and user experience.
Who gave them PERMISSION to let 12 AI tools rifle through your skin exam photos?!
Nimblr published a roundup of 12 AI tools targeting dermatology practices in 2026, covering patient access, documentation, prior authorization, and revenue operations. A single dermatology day involves full-body skin exams, lesion descriptions, biopsies, excisions, cryotherapy, pathology followups, and photography, each generating clinical documentation and downstream tasks. These AI tools are designed to offload repetitive operational and information-processing work from constrained dermatology teams so physicians can focus on evaluating skin disease, performing procedures, and maintaining patient continuity.
I am NOT okay with Pabau's AI Scribe listening to your wellness consultation!
Pabau published a guide to 9 wellness clinic software platforms for 2026, positioning its own platform as the standout choice for clinics running 3 or more practitioners with mixed aesthetic and clinical services. Pabau differentiates from scheduling-first competitors by combining clinical-grade documentation with business operations across medical aesthetics, functional medicine, integrative health, longevity clinics, and allied health. The platform includes Pabau Scribe, an AI tool that assists with clinical note generation and documentation to reduce administrative burden.
Who gave them PERMISSION to replace the pro shop staff with ALGORITHMS while greens fees go UP?
Golf Genius is pushing AI across ALL its golf technology products to automate administrative work, from processing pro shop shipments to running tournament operations. Bobby Jones Links confirms payroll is the single largest expense at golf clubs, targeting 45% to 55% of gross revenue, so of course they're coming for human jobs to squeeze that number down. The Forbes piece admits the ROI only works if time saved actually translates into something real, which is corporate speak for we hope this pays for itself before anyone notices the service got worse.
I am NOT okay with AI apps grading my kid's baseball swing when the baseball feedback is an AFTERTHOUGHT.
A review at mindandmuscle.ai tested every free AI baseball swing analyzer app and found that the top platform's baseball-specific feedback is less refined than its golf analysis, because golf is the platform's heritage. The free tier gives you about 3 analyses per month, which the review admits is enough for a weekly check-in but NOT for daily cage work. The AI pose detection returns automated reports on swing plane, body rotation, and finish position, but the review is basically telling you the baseball side is the leftover scraps from a golf product.
Who gave them PERMISSION to unleash ELEVEN models on us when they can't even get ONE right?!
Netlify decided to run ANY OpenRouter model, including Kimi K3, GLM 5.2, and DeepSeek V4, and then tested 11 of them on the same coffee shop website prompt. They asked each model to build a one-page site with opening hours, address, menu, and a photo, and wouldn't you know it, they got 11 DIFFERENT results. They even had to specifically warn the models not to produce that dreaded purple AI slop that EVERYONE is sick of seeing.
I am NOT okay with being told I need a COURSE just to survive the AI takeover they FORCED on us!
PCMag is pushing a course called 'AI Made Simple' for $14.99, marked down from $29, that promises to teach you practical AI skills in just over an hour. The course covers beginner-friendly step-by-step lessons, simple privacy habits, how to recognize when AI gets something wrong, and how to use it responsibly. The demonstrations use Claude, and the techniques supposedly transfer to other tools.
I am NOT okay with this. Researchers Just Caught AI Models Spilling Their SECRET Thoughts And Nobody Told Us.
Researchers figured out how to pull "reasoning traces" out of Claude, GPT, and Gemini, the AI models we have ALL been typing our personal questions into. They found evidence that some Chinese AI models may have been trained on leading US models, which OpenAI told US lawmakers in February that DeepSeek seemed to have copied one of its models. Mark Zuckerberg defended the practice called "distillation" in a blog post this week, saying it is "an important principle of how the open source ecosystem works" and that restricting it would put the US at a disadvantage.
Who gave him PERMISSION?! Zuckerberg Now Wants To Hand Us ALL A Personal Superintelligence Like That Is Supposed To Make Us Feel BETTER.
Meta released a new open-weight model called Muse Glimmer, and Mark Zuckerberg used a letter on Monday to push his vision of distributing superintelligence widely to individuals. He said it "has the potential to begin a new era of personal empowerment" where people can "reach their full potential." Last year he argued advanced AI should empower individuals rather than stay concentrated in a few companies' hands, while also warning Meta would have to be careful about which models it releases openly due to safety concerns.
Who gave them PERMISSION to tell me a $20 chatbot will replace my LIVELIHOOD?
Some blog called Dumb Little Man is out here telling people to use ChatGPT to crank out freelance articles on Upwork and Fiverr, bragging about how experienced freelancers are reporting higher project throughput without more hours worked. They literally admit the people making $200 per article instead of $20 are the ones who already knew their market BEFORE AI showed up. So the people who did NOT spend years building expertise are being told they can compete by churning out AI content for peanuts.
I am NOT okay with AI marketing gurus telling small business owners to just FAKE IT with robots.
A marketing company called Lime Group LLC posted a blog telling small business owners in Florence, Alabama, Muscle Shoals, Sheffield, Tuscumbia, and Jackson, Tennessee to use AI to write their marketing content but then edit it so it sounds like a real person. They admit customers do not want to hear from a robot. They want to hear from a real business owner. And yet their advice is to let the robot write it first and then sprinkle in some local details like that makes it authentic.
Who gave them PERMISSION to let AI heat maps steal clients while we're still paying $847 for spreadsheets?!
Dale Krenz, a 41-year-old running Rimrock Digital out of Spokane, lost his biggest client because a competing agency used AI-powered heat map SEO tracking that showed rankings block by block. He spent $847 and six weeks testing 8 local SEO platforms after getting that wake-up email at 6:14 AM on a Tuesday in February. The client's words stung: your spreadsheets don't tell us what the other agency's heat map shows.
I am NOT okay with Trapica running my ad budget on AUTOPILOT while nobody tells me what it's doing!
A review of 9 Meta Ads automation tools highlights Trapica, which learns from your conversion data and adjusts audience targeting autonomously without you setting any manual rules. AdStellar is another platform that takes a product URL and turns it into a live optimized campaign without switching tools. These tools are being pitched as the answer to creative generation, budgeting, and optimization all in one.
Who gave them PERMISSION?! AI Is Now Mapping Our FACES and Deciding What Needs Fixing.
Dermatologist Dr. Priyanka Sharma told HT Lifestyle that AI is being used for facial mapping and cosmetic treatment planning, claiming it makes consultations more precise and personalized. She did have the sense to say treatment decisions must STILL be guided by a qualified dermatologist who can interpret AI-generated insights alongside facial anatomy, medical history, and individual expectations. But she also gushed about "realistic treatment previews" like that is supposed to make me feel BETTER about a computer analyzing my wrinkles.